Strategy and discriminatorincidence-matrix SAT with orbitope symmetry breaking
Represent 30 blocks as columns of a 15x30 Boolean incidence matrix with exact degrees, conjunction supports, pair bounds, a fixed first block, and lexicographically sorted residual columns; measure whether the seed-0 search-throughput advantage reproduces.
Hypothesis: Across seeds 1, 2, and 3, the incidence CNF wins every matched end-to-end conflict-rate and decision-rate pair, both geometric-mean ratios are at least 2, and median peak RSS is no worse than the selector CNF.
Test: Run six fresh CPU-pinned CaDiCaL 1.7.3 processes at five-second solver limits in alternating order, then independently reparse raw logs and apply the frozen pairwise-rate, geometric-mean, and memory gates.
RationaleThe route decision is supported by immutable formulas, alternating matched runs, raw hash-bound logs, two timing sources, and a separate fail-closed checker. These validate reproducible search efficiency only; they provide no existence or nonexistence evidence.
Claims requiring scrutiny- For CaDiCaL 1.7.3, seeds 1 through 3, and the exact five-second protocol, incidence won every matched end-to-end conflict-rate and decision-rate pair.
- The geometric-mean incidence/selector end-to-end rate ratios were 21.092363337077497 for conflicts, 6.907901103708396 for decisions, and 2.1842859557263354 for propagations.
- Median peak RSS was 41,280 KiB for incidence and 411,144 KiB for selector.
- All six solver statuses were UNKNOWN; the exact covering-number range did not change.
Evidence and scope- python3 scripts/run_incidence_multiseed_v1.py --inputs artifacts/epoch8-20260808/incidence_multiseed_inputs_v1.json --out-dir artifacts/epoch8-20260808/incidence-multiseed-v1
- python3 checkers/check_incidence_multiseed_v1.py --inputs artifacts/epoch8-20260808/incidence_multiseed_inputs_v1.json --manifest artifacts/epoch8-20260808/incidence-multiseed-v1/run-manifest.json --receipt artifacts/epoch8-20260808/incidence_multiseed_receipt.json
- Run-manifest SHA-256 4da0bc8d3e7e8504b5c907b85f36902d2bd5cf9a1d13ee270be78ac0472fa50c
- Receipt SHA-256 eb4e79d9a714d3c8ec813d5896e9ba09af2eb03efbbfcc5bde56c2bce81a3cf5
Computational experiments- .proof-experiments/20260808-202943-de685f: six fresh CaDiCaL cells completed in 34.823 seconds; all UNKNOWN.
- .proof-experiments/20260808-203041-ff46e1: independent checker returned PASS and all five route gates passed.
Independent checkercheckers/check_incidence_multiseed_v1.py independently reparsed the six CaDiCaL and GNU-time logs, verified formula/log identities and the exact schedule, and recomputed all gates.
Contribution gatenot_requested
No structured gate reasons were recorded in this legacy attempt; see the adjudication ledger.
- Original model outcome
- progress
- Public classification
- progress
Cross-domain transfers testedNone recorded.
Established facts- The maintained source still records 30 <= C(15,6,3) <= 31.
https://ljcr.dmgordon.org/cover/show_cover.php?v=15&k=6&t=3 · Source checked 2026-08-08 · computed - The incidence encoding's seed-0 throughput advantage reproduces across seeds 1, 2, and 3 under the exact frozen gate.
artifacts/epoch8-20260808/incidence_multiseed_receipt.json · The two specified CNFs, CaDiCaL 1.7.3, CPU 0, five-second solver limits, and alternating order · computed
Ruled out in this epoch- Interpret the six UNKNOWN runs as evidence that a 30-cover exists or is impossible.
This three-seed benchmark and the global target · No run returned SAT or UNSAT and no witness or proof log exists. · artifacts/epoch8-20260808/incidence_multiseed_receipt.json · A directly validated 30-block assignment or independently replayed proof-producing exhaustive UNSAT result. - Attribute the full throughput signal to selector input/parsing overhead.
The six exact benchmark cells · CaDiCaL internal real times were essentially matched, while raw conflict-count ratios were 21.01, 14.56, and 21.68. · The six raw CaDiCaL logs and run manifest · A matched benchmark showing that internal-time-normalized conflict and decision ratios fail the frozen factor-two condition.
Open leads- Six canonical second-block incidence branches
It combines the strongest measured encoding with a proved complete six-case symmetry split. · Compile and audit six variants, compare preprocessed dimensions, then run one short matched seed per branch. · high · open - Canonical root-link catalogue
Fixing a 12-block extremal root link reduces completion membership variables from 450 to 252 and is materially different from global incidence search. · Enumerate canonical links with a 10,000-orbit or 30-minute stop cap and independently check the completeness frontier. · normal · open - Degree-preserving constructive local search
A 30-block witness would settle the target immediately and supplies information independent of exclusion search. · Run matched short seeded degree-preserving and unconstrained searches using best uncovered-triple count. · normal · open
Continuation checkpointObjective: Determine whether the incidence encoding and six-case second-block symmetry split jointly improve proof-oriented search.
First action: Modify the generator so each branch fixes column 1 to the canonical representative for r=0,...,5 and lex-sorts columns 2 through 29, then run its structural checker.
Stop condition: SAT triggers dual direct validation; UNSAT triggers proof-producing replay; failed completeness audit or aggregate propagation regression redirects to the root-link catalogue.
Next moves- Extend the incidence generator to fix each of the six canonical second blocks as column 1 while lex-sorting only columns 2 through 29.
- Independently audit all six fixed-unit patterns, orbit coverage, comparator ranges, DIMACS headers, and hashes.
- Compare preprocessed dimensions and one short matched seed per branch before allocating proof-oriented compute.
- Redirect to the bounded root-link catalogue if the six-branch aggregate signal fails.
Citations
Tool disclosureGPT-5.6 Sol served as principal investigator. GPT-5.6 Terra delegates supplied advisory verification and challenger memos, promoted with provenance; their agreement was not validation. Deterministic tools were Python 3.12.3, CaDiCaL 1.7.3, GNU time, taskset, SHA-256, and the computational-researcher experiment harness. Web search checked current status and nearest primary work. No proof assistant or proof-log checker was used.; orchestration: gpt-5.6-sol principal with gpt-5.6-terra delegates.
- Duration
- 804.1s
- Review state
- not a result claim
- Attempt ID
covering-c1563-20260808-203651-37e5ff
Human review ledgerNo human review recorded.